Mullaney

Notes

1. citizenkerry likes this
2. khealywu likes this
3. chrisreblogs reblogged this from improvnonsense and added:

   I really do love 5. BUT I think everyone should at least try 2* or 3. (Shameless plug: I have a discounted coaching rate...

4. corypalmer likes this
5. dontcookbilly reblogged this from frollospeaks and added:

   Youve performed with 3. I’ve found the most fun was with 3 or 4. 5 at most.

6. frollospeaks reblogged this from ryanxilliams and added:

   I like this because I don’t think I’ve ever performed with less than 8 people and I can agree that it is a terrible...

7. curtisretherford likes this
8. joestanton reblogged this from ryanxilliams and added:

   4, 8, 15, 16, 23, 42

9. ryanxilliams reblogged this from montrealimprov and added:

   6,840,507,003

10. montrealimprov reblogged this from mullaney
11. patbaer reblogged this from mullaney and added:

    From my own experience, I would say 3 or 4.

12. messily likes this
13. mullaney reblogged this from improv-is-easy and added:

    Yes.

14. youcancallmeadmiral likes this
15. willzone reblogged this from improvnonsense and added:

    why 6 ain’t get no love?

16. thatbirch likes this
17. brenttharshman likes this
18. joeydundale said: Nah, 6 bro.
19. tickledfancy likes this
20. shortmikeshort reblogged this from improv-is-easy and added:

    I would actually like to see a theater where house teams are made with six people, rather than the current apparent...

21. britajames likes this
22. iamachilles likes this
23. ivylions reblogged this from improvnonsense
24. improvnonsense reblogged this from mullaney
25. williebhines likes this
26. improv-is-easy reblogged this from mullaney and added:

    My take… 1st - 5 2nd - 7 or 3 3rd - 2 or 4 4th - 6 or 8

27. ellena likes this
28. heykurt likes this
29. theangeladee likes this
30. mullaney posted this